Rob Bell's theological trajectory is not good. Case in point, this article from the Boston Globe.
Here, for example, is Bell's definition of an evangelical, completely devoid of any theological or historical meaning.I embrace the term evangelical, if by that we mean a belief that we together can actually work for change in the world, caring for the environment, extending to the poor generosity and kindness, a hopeful outlook. That's a beautiful sort of thing.
And here's Bell's take on the heart of Christianity:At the heart of the Christian story is resurrection, the belief that this world is good, and that, as a follower of Jesus, a belief that God hasn’t abandoned the world, but is actively at work in the world. Even in the midst of what can look like despair and destruction there is a new creation present.
He gets two points for mentioning resurrection and minus ten points for not mentioning the resurrection, the resurrection of Jesus Christ for the justification of sinners (Rom. 4:25). Read the rest here.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Rob Bell Fan? Read This
Kevin DeYoung has a great post on Rob Bell. He begins: